Climate Change Lies-Just 3 Will Do

Climate Change, United Nations International Panel on Climate Change (UN-IPCC ) designated human caused (Anthropomorphic  Global Warming -AGW), is solely aimed at designating man’s industrial produced Co2 as the Climate Change cause; no other possibility.  To normal people, climate is actually called “Weather” and it changes daily.  But not for the UN-IPCC modeling and tax-based revenue industry.   Alarmist lies seem to be their basis - how are they wrong?

Lie one:  “Man’s industrial development is the cause proven by rising temperatures.” 

Actually, earth has a long history of weather cycles including a Medieval Warm Period (900 – 1400 AD) follow by a Little ice Age (1450 – 1800 AD) followed by a return to stability with alternative cool and warm periods in the 20th Century (source: Larocque-Tobler et al., Quaternary Science Review, 2010).  Since 1997, some 16 years, there has been no warming, even considering El Ninos in 1998 & 2009.  Land surface average change US – zero (Source: NASA/GISS “Common Sense Climate Index”); Sea Surface Temp – zero (Source: Gouretski 2013_Anderson 2013_Global Research Letters and ESRI/NOAA/GOV); and Atmosphere –zero (Source: Satellite Observations/Hadley radiosones Center, UK)

Lie two: “ IPCC temperatures  graphed by Michael Mann show a definite temperature rise!” 

The data source is from National Weather Service (NOAA)’s 1221 climate-monitoring stations.  A physical assessment via thermal imagery by Anthony Watts, Meterologist, Surface Stations Project, indicated 865 of 1221 station’s data was compromised by its location within meters of an artificial heating source, e.g. heating source within measurement housing, beside building radiating heat or heat radiating  water treatment plants, etc., temperature errors ranged from 1 to 5 degrees.  Thus a primary source and  basis for Michael Mann’s data is erroneous and unreliable as well as recent data reliability retractions by Dr. Mann, himself.

Lie three:  “Climate models project atmospheric warming of at least 3 degrees Celsius over the last 15 years.”   Not so!  No observed ocean warming; no hot-spot tropical regions detected; polar warming limited to north polar region, not both poles as predicted; meteorological sensitivity observations are 1 degree Celsius or less-not doubling; models fail to include variations of solar magnetic field/cosmic ray fluctuation-known climate influences; climate temperature rise started some 50 years into the Industrial Revolution – not concurrent with it; and models fail to capture lesser-scale phenomena such as ‘clouds’ (Source:  Chapter 1, Climate Change Reconsidered II, Heartland Institute – 2013).

The above kind of ‘it ain’t necessarily so” information is too readily available should any individual wish to investigate.  Unfortunately, most of the ‘Climate Change Advocates’ prefer UN-IPCC talking points over real, observed science.  Disregard the ‘98% of Climate Scientist’s Agree (75 of 10,257  were Climate Scientists) ’ talking point;  we should be more impressed with the Oregon Petition signed by 31,487 scientists who agree ‘there is no convincing evidence that human releases of Co2, methane or other greenhouse gasses is or will cause catastrophic heating” to the Earth or its climate.  Check your pocketbook; that is what Climate Disruption is all about.