.

Valero Applies to Build 'Crude by Rail Project'; Up to 70K Barrels Would Come to Benicia by Train, Daily

The tracks would extend from Union Pacific rails into the refinery and construction would begin in mid-2013 and they’d begin using the rail-offloading facility in 2014.

 

Valero currently gets its crude oil shipped into Benicia via pipelines and boats, but that could soon change.

The company has applied to build a set of tracks that would ship oil into the refinery by way of railcar as well. The tracks would extend from Union Pacific rails into the refinery to be unloaded. Construction would begin in mid-2013 and Valero would begin using the rail-offloading facility in 2014.

Click image for 27-page application (PDF) >>

Benicia’s Community Development Director Charlie Knox told us today that he’s under the impression that the oil brought in via train would come from North Dakota, but others have speculated the oil would come form Canada. It's possible North Dakota is just a stop along the way, Knox said. 

According to The Motley Fool, getting pipelines approved is a long and challenging process, so companies are focusing on rail, “because the speed to bring rail operations online using existing lines is much faster than building new pipeline networks.” They report that Valero plans to buy 1,000 rail cars and use them to “move oil sands away from Alberta,” Canada.

Canadian tar sand oil is cheaper than Alaskan crude, which could be one reason for the railcars if the oil is indeed coming in from Canada.

The Valero construction would consist of a rail offloading rack, pump, piping, and crude storage tank – all of which would be permanent structures.

These additions would not increase the amount of oil that comes through the Valero refinery, according to the application. The purpose, they say, is to diversify the sources used to ship crude oil in. Currently, everything comes in via pipeline and boat. 

Below, we'll walk you through some of the details of the application. (Read the full PDF above). Note: The Y connector in green on figure 1 of the PDF has been removed from the project by Valero, according to Knox. It's no longer a part of the project. 

Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Why does Valero want to build this? 

The purpose of this project is to allow Valero to receive a larger proportion of its crude oil by railcar, up to 70,000 barrels per day of North American crude. The project would not increase the refinery’s total crude oil throughput or result in an increase in the production of existing products or byproducts because the increase in crude oil deliveries by railcar would be offset by a corresponding decrease in crude oil deliveries by marine vessels. No modifications would be made to refinery process equipment and there would be no net increase in operational emissions.

How would this affect traffic? 

The vehicle traffic associated with the project would be one or two additional locomotive trips per day with 100 or 50 railcars, respectively. The locomotive trips are scheduled for around noon each day, but this could change for the project as potentially required for mitigation of local traffic impacts. (Note: This has changed. Knox said they will only be used from around midnight to 5 a.m., so as not to clock up the rail yard).

When would it be built and what would be the effects?

Construction of the new rail spurs and runaround track would involve some dust generation and noise and odors associated with minor amounts of heavy construction equipment, but this would be temporary. The project involves bringing in more crude via rail, but also decreases the amount of crude brought in by ship. There would be no net increase in hazardous materials involved with this project, but the location would be different, i.e. at the rail unloading rack versus the dock.

Valero says this will not result in an increase in emissions (since more train shipments will result in fewer boat shipments), but they say they will document any changes and seek approval from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District.

We’ll follow up on this story as we learn more and as we chat with Valero. For now, feel free to click through their application and share your thoughts below. 

Robert Livesay February 28, 2013 at 03:47 PM
JB I am not going after people who do not comment on this story. You of all people know better than that. You know that I am talking about the agenda driven folks and JB you know who they are. They do not have to comment. As far as Monterey Shale oil there is also is a train that will come directly to Valero from the valley. JB can not you see why Valero might spend 30 mil on this project. Please JB it is right there for you see and you missed it. It is called domestic oil and maybe some from Canada. They may even want to expand for storage. But I do understand there turn around time is in and out and at present no need for storage. This is a way to get product to the refinery in a less expensive way. Maybe even save Valero from having to move out of California. I do not understand JB why you can not see what is happening.
JB Davis February 28, 2013 at 06:47 PM
Bob, The point I was making is that it is cheaper to move oil by pipeline than it is to move it by rail and since there is a pipeline already in place to move oil from the Central Valley to the Bay Area, chances are trains won't be used to move that oil.
Robert Livesay February 28, 2013 at 07:08 PM
Remember JB the train runs right thru the valley from Bakersfield on up. Right in the heart of the Monterey Shale oil field. I understand the pipeline issue. Put when you can go by rail where there may not be a pipeline it will be cost effective. Using existing rail lines will in many cases be much more price effective than building more pipe lines. This rail issue is huge for the City of Benicia. Remember over 30 mil. Not bad.
C.C. March 12, 2013 at 11:03 AM
On the face of it sounds like a decent idea. I do however have a concern. Living in Benicia I understand the benefit of having Valero as a revenue sorce. I think the question should not be focused on the method of shipment so much as the type of product being shipped. Shale oil by its very nature is dirtier than crude as as a result the refining pollutes more. Chevrons recent attempt to revamp it production capabilities to refine shale oil was shut down for this very reason. The question should be are we ready for this? That said I am not a greenie but rather am concerned about my families health.
Robert Livesay March 12, 2013 at 05:57 PM
C.C. your comment is the best I have seen on this issue. We as residents do need to know. But as Valero says there will not be an increase in emissions. I happen to believe them. Shipping by rail and reducing shipment by ship will also cut down on polutiuon. So as we see it is a very good situation. Valero and other refineries are shipping oil from Bakken and Canada to the gulf refineries. Valero has already prepared for the refining of the shale crude with new tech and a 180 mile pipeline to send hydrogen to their gulf refineries. It appears Valero is on the cutting edge of refining shale oil much cleaner which means it will also burn cleaner. With the Monterey Shale field right here in California Valero it appears is preparing it self to help the USA become energy independent. I do support Valero as I do hope others do. Also the California legislastire is already preparing new bills to insure that shale oil will be extracted very clean with no enviro harm. It is important that we work together to make America energy independent and also a exporter of oil. Remember at one time we were the largest export of oil. Lets get there again.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »