Guest Editorial: Why you should vote Yes on Prop 30 and No on Prop 32

Have an idea for an editorial about a newsworthy topic, and need more than 300 words to express it? Email jbdavis@patch.com to share your views.

By Mark Maselli

Why should you vote yes on prop 30? There are many reasons. Prop 30 is necessary because our schools have not received the funding they are owed under the formula guaranteed by Prop 98. Under Prop 98 a percentage of our state budget goes into education. However, when the state cannot afford to pay what it owes our schools, it simply says, “We’ll give you an IOU”. Over the last four years, our schools have lost $20 billion because our schools are only getting 70 cents for every dollar they’re supposed to! When schools don’t get the funding what happens? Larger class sizes, loss of instructional days, no new technology or textbooks, loss of programs like art and music, and whatever else the districts decide to eliminate because they don’t have the money.  Our schools, community colleges, and universities, cannot afford to be cut any more. If 30 fails, we will face an additional $5.5 billion in cuts this school year! What else is there to cut? We are at bare bones as it is. Prop 30 will pay back all those IOU’s from the state over the next 4 years so schools can reinstate programs, bring back class size reduction, and provide students with materials they need. The revenue will also help the colleges reduce fees and add classes as they will be paid back money they are owed.

Where does the revenue come from? There are two parts to this tax measure: the first part is a small income tax increase. The increase starts on individuals making $250,000 a year or households making $500,000. That group would see a 1% increase. Individuals making between $300,000 to $500,000 or households at $600,000 to $1,000,000 would see a 2% increase. Individuals over $500,000 or households over $1,000,000 would see a 3% increase. The income tax increase lasts for 7 years. Prop 30 asks the top 2% of households to pay a bit more in income tax to help save our schools. There is also a sales tax increase of ¼% for 4 years; that means for every $100 you spend you will pay an extra quarter in sales tax. I think that is worth it. The temporary sales tax lasts for 4 years.

Additionally, because Prop 30 was done through the initiative process, legislators cannot extend these temporary tax increases. If anyone wanted to continue the taxes after the sunset date they would have to collect the signatures out in public, get it on the ballot, and get people to vote for it again. The temporary tax increases cannot just be continued by the will of the government.

For all of these reasons, I hope you’ll support our public schools and vote Yes on Prop 30.

Equally important is the issue of Prop 32. Why should you vote No on Prop 32? The idea behind Prop 32 sounds good: let’s take special interest money out of Sacramento. If this were really the case, I would be working for its passage. However, the proponents of Prop 32 do not want to take all money out of politics, just one side’s money. The language of Prop 32 prohibits only one type of money: voluntary payroll deductions to be used for political purposes. All other types of money are still allowed to be used, including profits. The reason the authors wrote the proposition like this is unambiguous. They know that 100% of the money that unions use in politics comes from these payroll deductions. How much of corporations money comes from these deductions? Less that 1% of corporations use any money from payroll deductions. Corporations get their money for politics form their treasuries and profits. What they are doing under Prop 32 is cutting the unions off at the knees while allowing corporations to continue business as usual. Corporations already outspend unions 15 to 1! Now they’re coming after the 1.

People might say, “Doesn’t it stop those corporations from giving money directly to candidates?” It does do that to the narrowly defined group of corporations. However, even so, these corporations can still give money to independent expenditure committees, otherwise known as SuperPACS. These SuperPACS can then use unlimited amounts of money to influence elections without any transparency.

What you end up with under Prop 32 is a government that is owned by the corporate powers even more than it is now. You can expect that this would only be the first step. If they can pass this, then they will have no opposition when the same corporate interest come back to get rid of collective bargaining, to repeal workplace safety laws, eliminate environmental protections, or privatize public education.  Just look at who is behind Prop 32. You will find many of the same people who were behind stripping Wisconsin workers of all their rights a few years ago. Please join me in voting No on Prop 32.


Karl Voigt October 26, 2012 at 04:28 PM
I'm happy to say I've already voted NO on 30 and YES on 32.
Marnix A. van Ammers October 26, 2012 at 05:16 PM
I support our schools and our working folks, and so I'm happy to say I've already voted Yes on 30 and NO on 32.
Robert Livesay October 26, 2012 at 05:33 PM
A good article but very one sided.
Jeff Arkin October 26, 2012 at 06:41 PM
I'd love to know if the extra monies will go directly to the schools, or if the Sacto bureaucrats will find a way to funnel more of it to their public union buddies. More taxes doesn't mean more money for the schools. It could be used to grow the bureaucracy. As to Prop 32, shouldn't we be controlling both corps AND the unions? Why does it have to be "either or?"
"The Black Panther of Poetry" October 26, 2012 at 09:46 PM
I will definitely, un-equivocally vote YES for Prop 30 and NO for Prop 32. Why you ask? One because it's only the fair and civil thing to do, and two because people like Karl Voigt is voting the opposite way. Bullies and Selfish people inspire me a lot!!!
leon johnson October 27, 2012 at 04:46 AM
silly me, I'm voting YES on 30 and no on 32 ,perhaps I should watch Fox News or listen to Sean Hannity more often
Bruce Rockwell October 27, 2012 at 05:05 AM
We are nearly dead last among all states in educational funding per $1,000 of income. We are nearly dead last in educational outcomes. Coincidence? At the school where I teach we are already at the maximum class sizes of 37 students for math. That's as many as will fit in a room, and if it weren't for the unions fighting to keep class sizes from exploding, we'd be teaching more students than that. Nobody who speaks about waste in the education system knows what they're talking about. The schools are withering on the vine for lack of funding. Prop 30 is not a permanent solution but it will stop the hemorrhaging for a while.
Gary W Smith October 28, 2012 at 06:49 PM
You 'yes votes' are lost. For years and years, you have thrown your money to Government to make education better and FAILED. Fall out rates, rising cost for little gain, high school graduates that must take 'bonehead courses' to survive their first years and too many other shortfalls. Stop paying the Teachers Associations to make money and have Teachers Organizations that are there to Teach. Learn to say NO to Government getting your hard-earned funds through taxes. Either that or just turn over your income to them so there is no interface and believe that things will get better - isn't that the Utopia you think you are headed toward?
Bruce Rockwell October 29, 2012 at 10:31 PM
You seem to be responding with a general gripe about government that is as old as the hills, but is not based in fact. The federal government is half the size it was during the Johnson administration, and on a per capita basis, the public sector is no larger than it was before WWII. The public sector isn't exploding, it's actually shrinking rapidly. If you've been paying any attention at all to the unemployment issue you would know that public sector job losses have been driving high unemployment for the last couple of years (and this absolutely does mean fewer teachers and larger class sizes). If you examine the state budget over the last twenty or thirty years (my assumption is that you haven't), you'll find that it has barely outpaced the annual compounding of inflation and population growth. Prop 30 isn't going to the general fund or to the unions, it's going directly to the schools which have been decimated for many years. And as to why education in general is getting more expensive, there are legitimate answers to that concern. But by posting something like this, you already self-identify as somebody who just doesn't care about such details. You guys have a nice game going. Make sure as little money as possible goes to schools, and then complain about the worsening educational outcomes. As if the two have no connection.
"The Black Panther of Poetry" November 01, 2012 at 01:48 PM
Amen Brother...Preach!!!
Robert Livesay November 01, 2012 at 06:57 PM
No on 30-yes on 32
Don Zampa November 01, 2012 at 08:07 PM
Unions have used their resources to fight on behalf of ALL of our communities for many things we take for granted such as; a minimum wage, teacher-student ratios, nurse-patient ratios, civil rights, clean air and water, workplace health and safety, the 8 hour day and many more regulations that have improved our lives. What will our state look like if the Unions cannot participate but those that fought against those improvements could? I'm with Mark. I voted Yes on 30, NO on 32.
M Maselli November 04, 2012 at 09:14 PM
I felt the need to comment on what people have written. If prop 30 doesn't pass you can be assured of a shorter school year and less programs. the schools have been cut 20 billon dollars over the last 4 years. There is no more "fat" to cut. Prop 30 also asks the most wealthy among us, the people who have done the best in a down economy to help keep our state educated. Prop 32 is a sham that would kill off the unions ability to be involved in politics while allowing c orporatiions to conitnue unharmed. The balance of power politically is already slanted against those who work for a living. Prop 32 would just slant it more.
B. Hussein Obama November 05, 2012 at 11:37 PM
I'm voting NO on Benicia Patch - I'm so sick of your liberal news bias, leading with this too-lengthy "guest" article the day before the election. Unsubscribe me. Just call this the Benicia Obama Patch - at least be honest and advertise up front that you can't begin to approach fair and balanced coverage - just cater to liberal democrats out there and leave the rest of us alone - the thousands of us in Benicia who don't march to the beat of liberalism are fed up with you and the SF Chronicle/LA Times bias.
JB Davis (Editor) November 06, 2012 at 12:17 AM
If the people who support Prop. 32 and oppose Prop. 30 had asked, I would have gladly given them equal space. They never asked.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something